CDCA e A Sud alla COP30 a Belém

Posted by salvatore on 10:59 am in News | Commenti disabilitati su

The United Nations Open-Ended Intergovernmental Working Group on Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises with respect to Human Rights (OEIGWG) was established on 26 June 2014 by the UN Human Rights Council. Its mandate is to “elaborate an international legally binding instrument to regulate, in international human rights law, the activities of transnational corporations and other business enterprises”. On 16 July 2018, after a series of informal consultations and meetings, the Permanent Mission of Ecuador has released the first draft of the legally binding instrument, that will be negotiated during the 4th Session of the OEIGWG which will take place from 15 to 19 October 2018.   The draft can be accessed here More information on the OEIGWG...

Posted by salvatore on 8:41 am in News | Commenti disabilitati su

[posted by Ucilia Wang on Climate Liability News, June 19th, 2018] The three Colorado communities that filed a climate liability lawsuit against ExxonMobil and Suncor Energy have added a conspiracy allegation to the complaint, which describes attempts by the two companies to deceive the public about the impact of fossil fuels on the climate. The amendment came two months after the city and county of Boulder, along with the County of San Miguel, first filed suit to seek a yet-specified amount of money to compensate for the damage caused by climate change. The communities are demanding the oil companies pay for efforts to adapt to and minimize the impact of climate change, which includes more severe wildfires, drought, floods, loss of mountain snowpack and pest-infested forests. The communities contend that Exxon and Suncor deliberately misled the public by failing to disclose the climate impact of fossil fuels. According to the lawsuit, both companies knew in the 1960s that they were selling goods that are the major drivers of global warming and cause public harm. The added conspiracy claim is meant to highlight company actions that were already in the initial complaint, said Marco Simons, legal counsel for EarthRights International, an advocacy group that is providing legal support for the communities. If the new allegation is found true in court, it can make each company liable for the other’s conduct, he said. “They both have a major presence in the state of Colorado, and they have connections to each other with respect to their conduct in Colorado,” Simons said. Both companies have yet to file their response to the lawsuit. Exxon did not respond to a request for comment on the lawsuit. A Suncor spokesperson said, “In regards to the amendments, we are reviewing and will work through the appropriate next steps. We believe that progress on climate requires parties working together to find solutions and this lawsuit is polarizing and counterproductive.” Colorado is a strong U.S. foothold for Suncor, a Canadian oil sands company. It runs one refinery and 47 gas and diesel stations in the state. Suncor says it supplies about 35 percent of the gasoline and diesel in Colorado. Exxon and Suncor have a strong business relationship. Suncor licenses the ExxonMobil brand for some of its retail stores in Colorado. Suncor co-owns an oil sands company, Syncrude Canada, with investors that include Imperial Oil, which is majority owned by Exxon. The lawsuit is one of 13 filed recently by American communities seeking compensation from fossil fuel companies for climate impacts. The most recent lawsuit came from Washington State’s King County, which includes Seattle. Other cities that have filed lawsuits include San Francisco, Oakland and Santa Cruz. New York City sued five oil companies and went to court last week to argue against a motion to dismiss the case. The presiding U.S. District Court Judge John F. Keenan, who didn’t rule immediately, expressed doubts that the city could sue fossil fuel companies when it relies on oil and gas to run public services such as fire and police. Historically, courts have acknowledged that climate change poses a serious threat to public and environmental health, but have not held any fossil fuel companies responsible. The Colorado plaintiffs, which are pursuing their case in the state court, argue that Exxon and Suncor’s deceptive tactics to market and sell fossil fuels have...

Posted by salvatore on 9:31 am in News | Commenti disabilitati su

[posted on The Conversation, June 4th, 2018]   Environmental justice activism is to this age what the workers’ movement was for the industrial age – one of the most influential social movements of its time. Yet, despite its consistent progress since the 1970s, environmental justice protests seem to get lost in the morass of information on broader environmental issues. In contrast, labour conflicts, including strikes and lock-outs, carry such gravity that the International Labour Organization tracks these on a systematic basis. As more communities are refusing to allow the destruction and contamination of their land, water, soil and air, these, in turn, deserve to be counted. The Environmental Justice Atlas (EJAtlas), an inventory of social conflicts around environmental issues, fills that gap. It is funded by two successive European research projects, through a collective effort of scientists and activists. It records the failures and successes of the worldwide movement for environmental justice. The project is directed and coordinated by Leah Temper, Daniela Del Bene and Joan Martínez-Alier at the Institute of Environmental Science and Technology at the Autonomous University of Barcelona. It has collected and categorised about 2500 ecological distribution conflicts. These focus on who gains and who loses in development processes, arguing that these movements play a fundamental role in redefining and promoting sustainability. In honour of World Environment Day, on June 5th, some of the highlights of the most pertinent findings, stemming from the ten most critical categories of environmental distribution conflicts facing the world today are shown. These are listed in order of most-catalogued cases in the EJAtlas. But due to the nature of the project, this is not indicative of its global significance.   The top ten environmental conflicts Land grabbing – 600+ conflicts. Booming palm oil production is behind a land-grabbing surge for plantations, which threatens communities. Palm oil is now in half of all packaged products sold in the supermarket. These plantations replace food crops, deprive farmers from their land, increase slave labour, cause environmental destruction like deforestation, water pollution, infertile soil and fires. Grassroots activist networks achieved temporary suspensions of further expansion of what they call green deserts in Honduras, Colombia, México, Indonesia and Myanmar. Renewable energy conflict – 31 wind; 326 water infrastructure conflicts Renewables are necessary in a post-carbon world, but mega dams like Narmada in India and mega wind projects in Mexico, Kenya, India are triggering conflicts. Methane emissions and cost overruns are hidden behind a twisted sustainability discourse to justify a new wave of dams, especially in the Himalayas, Amazon basin, Balkans and Africa. In response, some rural communities are creating cooperative wind energy models as alternatives to the corporate schemes. These in turn reshape global production and consumption patterns. Also, communities expose the injustice of large-scale dam projects and redefine their own energy transformations. Mega-mining – 270 conflicts New technologies, highly polluting chemicals and massive amounts of water accompany mega-mining expansion in Latin America and Western Africa. Examples of this is seen in bauxite or iron in Guinea, gold in Burkina Faso, Senegal and Ghana). Resistance in Latin America and Africa is strong. Often, there is high participation and leadership of women. Affected communities are developing new local initiatives that are more sustainable. Unburnable fuels – 178 conflicts The fossil fuel industry, faced with declining stocks, depends on unconventional means and locations of extraction. These extend to oil sand drilling and fracking to Arctic drilling and deep water petroleum sources. It has caused contamination of fresh water supplies, devastation of marine systems, seismic activity and global warming. This gave rise to a Blockadia movement of direct action. Blockadia connects the various struggles to highlight the global and local threats posed by oil, coal and gas extraction. Massive oppositions have resulted...

Posted by salvatore on 9:23 am in News | Commenti disabilitati su

[posted by J Sam Daniel Stalin on NDTV, May 28th, 2018] In the village of 2,000, around 60 people have cancer and they blame the smelter, even though the state government has not carried out any specific study to identify the cause for cancer in high numbers among residents around the plant. In a village called Silverpuram in Tamil Nadu, 31-year-old Ram Lakshmi’s husband Murugan died of intestinal cancer three years ago. Visually challenged Ram Lakshmi now struggles to make ends meet. She earns Rs. 2,500 a month and sends two children to school – Tamil Selvam and Tamil Selvi. Her son wants to be a police officer; her daughter is yet to make up her mind. Next door, Meera lost her husband Subaiah recently to liver cancer. Her husband’s treatment wiped her out. Meera’s son was forced to drop out of school to earn some money. He works as a truck cleaner now. Meera is somehow managing to send her daughter to school. On the same street, a few houses away, Helen Hepsibah is suffering from cancer of the kidneys. Helen had surgery recently for the removal of one of the affected kidneys. Six years ago, Helen’s friend A Rajaselvi, in the same neighbourhood, lost her mother Velamal to uterine cancer. All three live in a village in Tuticorin that is just about 3 km from Vedanta’s Sterlite plant –  the epicenter of protests by hundreds of villagers against a copper smelter they said was harming the environment and their health. In the village of 2,000, around 60 people have cancer and they blame the smelter, even though the state government has not carried out any specific study to identify the cause for cancer in high numbers among residents around the plant. Sterlite asserts that the correlation between industrialization and cancer is “misplaced” and has not been established by any study. Ram Lakshmi isn’t convinced. “This plant should not be allowed. No children should suffer like this. When others call their fathers appa, my children are unable to,” she says. Her neighbour Meera says: “They should shut down Sterlite. At least our children should be fine.” Effluents, slag and gypsum dumped over the last two decades have contaminated the ground water in several areas around the plant, say activists, adding that several water bodies and public tube wells have been abandoned as the water is discoloured and unusable. An analysis by the state pollution control board of water samples from 15 locations in the vicinity of the Sterlite plant revealed toxins beyond the safe limit, according to official sources. Sources in the Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board have told NDTV that neurotoxins like lead were detected in the water, in quantities as high as 39 to 55 times the safe limit. Countering the allegations, Sterlite furnished reports of tests by the anti-pollution board on water from village bore-wells in the vicinity of the plant. The report shows that the arsenic, zinc and fluoride content in the water are within permissible limits, but does not talk about lead. Sterlite also refers to a report in 2014 by the state Health Department, in which Thoothukudi ranked behind many districts in the number of cancer cases. Another more recent government report indicates Tuticorin is not among the cities in Tamil Nadu with the highest...

Posted by salvatore on 8:03 am in News | Commenti disabilitati su

It is illegal to set fire to someone’s house; we believe it is also illegal for fossil fuel companies to knowingly burn our common home. Today, the global call for climate justice is growing louder, Sara Shaw and Freek Bersch write   Twenty years ago, Shell made a prediction. In a scenario-planning exercise, the fossil fuel company prophesied a series of violent storms caused by catastrophic climate change would hit the east coast of the United States. Following the storms, the 1998 document unearthed by journalist Jelmer Mommers says, ‘a coalition of environmental NGOs brings a class-action suit against the US government and fossil-fuel companies on the grounds of neglecting what scientists (including their own) have been saying for years: that something must be done.’ Shell’s oracles could have not have been more accurate. The social reaction to the use of fossil fuels is growing, and people are fed up with corporate impunity and are fighting the British-Dutch oil giant in the world’s courts. Shell knew that its operations would increase the likelihood of extreme weather events, such as last year’s hurricanes Irma, Jose, Maria and Harvey. Shell has known since the 1960s that CO2 contributes to global warm-ing and that fossil fuels are a primary source of CO2 emissions. And Shell knew that we, the inhab-itants and caretakers of this planet, would become fierce opponents of their company and demand action.   The People vs. Shell Shell’s activities and business model constitute a profound risk for humankind. In April, Friends of the Earth Netherlands (Milieudefensie) wrote to Shell, arguing that the company is breaching its legal duty of care by undermining the Paris climate agreement. In that letter we demanded that the company align its business activities with that agreement, reduce oil and gas investments, and re-duce greenhouse gas emissions to zero by 2050. Shell rejected our demands in their response sent on Monday. Worse, the company callously urged shareholders to vote against a resolution asking the company to set emission reduction targets in line with the Paris agreement at its annual general meeting last week. Most investors followed Shell’s advice and the resolution was rejected. Since Shell rejected our demands, we are taking the company to court in the Netherlands to force them to reduce their emissions to net-zero by 2050. Our case is unique because we are not seek-ing compensation for damages. Instead, we are demanding that Shell aligns its business model with climate targets and that fossil fuels be kept in the ground. More than 25,000 people from 80 countries have already supported our case against Shell, including almost 12,000 Dutch citizens as co-claimants. If successful, our ground-breaking case will significantly limit Shell’s global oil and gas investments. We’re using the Dutch legal system to stop Shell because its Netherlands-registered parent company, Royal Dutch Shell, determines the group’s climate policy. Dutch law places Shell under a legal obligation to respect human rights and act responsibly, in accordance with the applicable duty of care standard. Duty of care is an open legal standard to be substantiated on the basis of the circumstances of the case at hand. The standard is determined on the basis of scientific findings and treaty provisions, among other things. By its own admission decades ago, Shell does not operate in a vacuum. Its actions affect all life on our planet, and Shell cannot be...

Aggiornamento progetto CleanUp 100celle – Patagonia

Posted by salvatore on 10:35 am in Notizie | Commenti disabilitati su Aggiornamento progetto CleanUp 100celle – Patagonia

Mercoledì scorso, con il supporto tecnico di SOURCE International e della PL, abbiamo prelevato 8 campioni di suolo all’interno del Parco Archeologico di Centocelle.   Il progetto intende arrivare ad una conoscenza puntuale delle criticità ambientali dell’area, attraverso un’analisi indipendente del suolo, e a diffondere i risultati ottenuti ai cittadini del quartiere e alla pubblica amministrazione.   L’obiettivo è sollecitare l’attività di bonifica del parco.   I campioni verranno analizzati nelle prossime settimane, a presto per gli aggiornamenti!     Guarda la scheda del progetto CleanUp 100Celle Guarda la scheda del...

Posted by salvatore on 8:57 am in News | Commenti disabilitati su

[posted by Chloe Farand on DesmogUK, June 18th, 2018]   One of the biggest corruption cases faced by the oil industry in recent years is due to resume in Milan on Wednesday as two of the world’s biggest oil companies Royal Dutch Shell and Italian firm Eni are facing trial. Prosecutors are bringing criminal charges against Shell and Eni executives over allegations of corruption regarding a $1.3 billion oil deal in Nigeria. This is the first time an oil company as large as Shell or senior executives of a major oil company have ever stood trial for bribery offences. The case, which has been repeatedly delayed, involves the 2011 purchase by Shell and Eni of Nigeria’s OPL 245 offshore oilfield — one of Africa’s most valuable oil blocks. Prosecutors in Milan have accused Shell and Eni of paying bribes to win the licence to explore the field which has never entered into production. They allege that Shell and Eni paid $1.1 billion into an account for the Nigeria government of which $800 million was later transferred to Malabu Oil and Gas, a company secretly owned by former Nigerian petroleum minister and convicted money launderer Dan Etete, to be distributed as payoffs. The $800 million payment was wired through London by bank JP Morgan Chase. A lawsuit accusing JP Morgan of negligence against the transfer has been filed against the bank in Nigeria. According to court documents seen by Reuters, the bank admitted it knew Etete would benefit from the $800 million payment. It also argued the UK’s Serious Organised Crime Agency (now the National Crime Agency) approved the payment. JP Morgan denied negligence and previously said it  “considers the allegations made in the claim to be unsubstantiated and without merit”. Prosecutors in Milan have also alleged that $520 million from the deal was converted into cash and intended to be paid to the then Nigerian President Goodluck Jonathan, members of the government and other Nigerian government officials. They claimed $50 million in cash was also delivered to the home of Eni executive Roberto Casula. Charges have been brought against Eni’s chief executive Claudio Descalzi and former chief of exploration and production for Shell Malcolm Brinded. No current Shell officials are facing charges in the case. Both Shell and Eni have repeatedly denied wrongdoing. In a statement, Shell said: “We believe the trial judges will conclude that there is no case against Shell or its former employees. There is no place for bribery or corruption in our company.” On its website, Eni said: “Eni’s Board of Directors has reaffirmed its confidence that the company was not involved in alleged corrupt activities in relation to the transaction.The board of directors also confirmed its full confidence that chief executive Claudio Descalzi was not involved in the alleged illegal conduct and, more broadly, in his role as head of the company.” The case is likely to shed some light on the murky dealings of international oil companies to access resources, including paying governments large sums of money in exchange of securing licensing rights. Barnaby Pace, from NGO Global Witness, said the trial could be “a turning point” for the oil industry. He said: “Some of the most senior executives of two of the biggest companies in the world could face prison sentences for a deal struck under their watch. Shell has recently accused one of these former executives of taking kickbacks in a separate Nigerian deal. How long before Shell cracks over this case too?” The case also highlights the role played...

Posted by salvatore on 9:59 am in News | Commenti disabilitati su

[posted by Greg Mercer on The Guardian, May 30th, 2018]   Every aspect of the indigenous Inuit culture grows from the land – but the unpredictable seasons are forcing the community to adjust their traditions   Martin Shiwak is navigating his snowmobile along the frozen shoreline when his eight-year-old son Dane, who is riding on the back, points at a wall of stunted spruce trees. Shiwak cuts the engine, hops off the machine and quietly pulls out a .12 gauge shotgun. He hands the weapon to Dane, and the pair crouch behind their snowmobile. Dane fires two quick shots. Two white partridges, almost invisible in the tree line, drop dead. Dane runs to retrieve the birds, warming his hands against their bodies to ward off the chill from the cold wind whipping in from the North Atlantic Ocean. Shiwak is an Inuit trapper and hunter who grew up relying on the wild bounty of Labrador. He takes his son out for trips like this every week, trying to pass on generations of knowledge around living off the land: how to collect firewood, hunt and fish, and travel safely in a place where the rhythm of life is still built upon ice and snow. But he’s running out of time. The sea surrounding coastal Labrador is warming at an unprecedented rate, according to data from Canada’s Department of Fisheries and Oceans. Robert Way, a climatologist based in Happy Valley-Goose Bay, said the region is a volatile place climatically, with extreme swings in the weather that can amplify – and sometimes mask – the changes that are happening. Compared to historical terms, winter is about six weeks shorter, while the region’s sea ice coverage is about a third smaller than it was a decade ago. Dane Shiwak, eight, warms his hands on white partridge he shot with his father, Martin Shiwak, outside Rigolet. Photograph: Darren Calabrese “If you look at the rate of warming from the late 1980s to 2015, this is one of the fastest warming places in the world. It’s quite concerning,” said Way. For the people of Rigolet, a former trading post that is the southernmost Inuit community in Canada, the vanishing ice and increasingly unpredictable seasons means they’re being forced to adapt in ways they never have before. Like generations of Inuit before him, Derrick Pottle is a trapper and hunter. His diet of wild game, salmon, berries, trout and seal would have been familiar to his ancestors who were living in Hamilton Inlet around 8,000 years ago. But Pottle worries all the skills he’s learned from older generations may soon become irrelevant. More and more, Inuit are relying on expensive, store-bought processed foods because it’s safer and easier than catching or shooting supper. Pottle’s ancestors never experienced a time when their frozen world in northern Labrador was being altered so dramatically because of climate change. Shrinking ice packs and more severe weather has made travel increasingly difficult and dangerous, often cutting people off from other communities and traditional hunting lands. There are no roads connecting Rigolet to other communities, so people here long ago came to rely on trails over the ice as their lifelines. But those frozen lifelines are increasingly unreliable, prone to sudden thaws, weak ice and dangerous openings. “I’m seeing changes that impact the way that...

Posted by salvatore on 9:49 am in News | Commenti disabilitati su

[posted by Ann Godwin on The Guardian, May 27th, 2018]   An environment expert, and the director of ecological think tank, Health of Mother of Earth Foundation (HOMEF), Nnimo Bassey spoke with ANN GODWIN in Port Harcourt, where he demands that urgent actions be taken to avert the impending human catastrophe. He also wants residents to sustain protest against the worsening atmospheric condition.   For over two years now, Port Harcourt has come under attack from black soot. As an environment expert, how worried are you? I will first of all react as a citizen because the soot prevalent in Port Harcourt should be a big embarrassment to the government since government has a duty to protect the citizens from harm, whether environmental or otherwise.  This soot has gone on now for close to two years in Port Harcourt, and there is nothing that is practically being done to halt it. What I am thinking now is that government should, as a matter of urgency, stop all the sources of soot because of all the sources, none is worthy of the lives of the people because what is happening right now is going to manifest as an epidemic in the nearest future. Everybody, whether rich or poor, politician and the ordinary citizen are all breathing the same air, so the Port Harcourt soot really underscores how dangerous and unregulated the environment is. Other communities where gas is flared do not really see the soot in the air, but the air is toxic. Since this one is visible and yet nothing is being done about it, everybody keeps on breathing the polluted air, and the children are especially being exposed to it.  I think that action by the masses, like the campaign against soot should be sustained until something is done.   But the politicisation of the issue between the state and the Federal Government seems to be part of the factors militating against finding a solution to the menace  Addressing the concerns raised by the black soot should never be subjected to any form of blame game or be politicized. In other words, everybody should sit down and take responsibility. Everybody; the citizens, I mean communities, local government councils, the state and indeed the Federal Government. You can’t say, I have done all I can do and I have nothing more to do because the only way to tackle it is by closing all the sources of the soot, and the sources you can point at include refinery, petrochemical outfits, illegal refineries in the creeks, the security forces who burn the stolen crude, gas flaring and then of course, other things like asphalt plants. These are the causes of the soot and it is a question of regulating the environment and going to the sources to stop the soot.  We must ask ourselves the question, ‘if a whole city will be covered with black soot, what is more valuable, life or the refinery that is not performing at any reasonable efficiency or level of productivity?’   Since illegal refineries constitute a major cause of black soot, could modular refineries planned by the Federal Government be of great assistance when they come on board? I do not think the modular refineries will stop illegal refineries as illegal refineries are an offshoot of oil theft in the Niger Delta, and oil theft is being...

Il difficile rapporto fra uomo e natura

Posted by salvatore on 9:15 am in Notizie | Commenti disabilitati su Il difficile rapporto fra uomo e natura

[di Raffaele Marini su Mountain Wilderness, 30 maggio 2018]   La tutela dell’ambiente e lo sviluppo turistico possono coesistere? Questa è la storia dell’Alpe Veglia e Devero, di un Parco nato nel 1978 e di un complesso progetto del valore di oltre 130 milioni di euro.   Il 1978 rappresenta un anno fondamentale per la protezione ambientale in Piemonte: viene istituito il Parco Naturale dell’Alpe Veglia nelle Alpi Lepontine occidentali. Enel aveva in progetto la realizzazione di un grande invaso idroelettrico che avrebbe cancellato la splendida conca alpina. Un geologo e uomo del Cai certificò che probabilmente il lago non si sarebbe mai riempito per la permeabilità dei terreni e i connessi rischi al tunnel ferroviario del Sempione. Il suo nome è Ardito Desio. L’Alpe Veglia ha peculiarità uniche: è un modello puro di alpeggio alpino, pascolato nel periodo estivo principalmente dai pastori di Varzo e Trasquera e frequentato da escursionisti consapevoli, totalmente inaccessibile durante il periodo invernale. Nel 1990 viene istituito il Parco Naturale dell’Alpe Devero per tutelare un’altra parte delle Lepontine, dove si coniugano in modo armonico civiltà delle Alpi e habitat di elevatissimo pregio naturalistico. Nel 1995 viene sancita l’unificazione dei due Parchi con la costituzione del Parco Naturale Veglia-Devero. Con questo atto la Regione ha di fatto inteso inserire questo “unicum” di ambiente e cultura alpina in un sistema di aree protette, riconoscendo specificità di tipo mineralogico, vegetazionale e faunistico di particolare pregio. Con l’istituzione della “Rete Natura 2000”, l’Unione Europea si è dotata di uno strumento di politica di conservazione della biodiversità; da qui nasce l’individuazione della ZSC “Alpe Veglia Devero, Monte Giove”, per un totale di oltre 15.000 ettari di regione biogeografica alpina. Questo complesso di ambienti a elevato valore naturalistico è stato ed è oggetto di studi scientifici: dagli efficienti sistemi di pascolamento estivo, alla conservazione delle popolazioni di tetraonidi (gallo forcello in particolare), dall’evolversi della dinamica delle popolazioni di stambecchi, camosci e di cervo, alla promozione e valorizzazione delle produzioni locali. Qui si sta sperimentando un modello assoluto di compatibilità ecologica. Le attività del tempo libero si sono principalmente sviluppate attraverso l’alpinismo, un escursionismo lento estivo mentre, nel periodo invernale, si è assistito alla progressiva espansione dell’utilizzo delle ciaspole a fianco di una pratica scialpinistica di richiamo europeo. Lo sci alpino ha trovato collocazione in alcune aree (San Domenico e Devero) come pure lo sci di fondo.   Avvicinare le montagne Questa rapida sintesi serve per inquadrare il contesto in cui si colloca un complesso progetto di sviluppo turistico denominato “Avvicinare le Montagne”, presentato dalla società privata San Domenico Ski, che attualmente gestisce gli impianti sciistici di San Domenico-Ciamporino, in comune di Varzo. Il progetto ha questa finalità principale, secondo i proponenti: «Sperimentare un modello di sviluppo territoriale non solo sostenibile ma soprattutto durevole, basato su una possibile relazione positiva tra uomo e natura.». E anche: «Un modello di sviluppo che parta da un atteggiamento positivo di fiducia nella capacità dell’uomo di trasformare in modo corretto il territorio, sul fatto che un’integrazione tra attività antropiche e natura è ancora possibile, e che non sia invece soltanto improntato sulla paura e sulla difesa a oltranza dello stato attuale delle cose», per un valore complessivo di oltre 130 milioni di euro. Da un lato si ipotizzano migliorie agli impianti esistenti (sostituzione di due impianti...