CDCA e A Sud alla COP30 a Belém

Posted by salvatore on 10:13 am in News | Commenti disabilitati su

[posted by Shashank Bengali and Ramin Mostaghin on Los Angeles Times, January 17, 2018] In the mountains of western Iran, the province of Chaharmahal-Bakhtiari is known for mile-high lagoons, flowing rivers and wetlands that attract thousands of species of migratory birds. But years of diminishing rainfall have shriveled water sources. Conditions worsened, residents say, after Iranian authorities began funneling water 60 miles away to the lowland city of Esfahan, sparking protests as far back as 2014. On Dec. 30 of last year, about 200 people gathered in front of the provincial governor’s office to protest the water transfer project. Their slogans soon morphed into chants of “Death to the dictator,” the main rallying cry of anti-government protesters who poured into streets nationwide in the biggest spasm of public anger Iran has seen in years. The uprising — in which at least 21 people died and thousands were arrested before authorities reimposed order — had many sparks: rising prices, persistent unemployment, bank collapses, a wide wealth gap, corruption in the theocracy. But an overlooked factor, analysts say, is the impact of climate change and the widespread perception that Iran’s leaders are mishandling a growing problem of water scarcity. “People believe that this is yet another major crisis the country is facing, and the people at the top are too incompetent and too corrupt to care,” said Meir Javedanfar, a professor of Iranian politics at Interdisciplinary Center Herzliya, an Israeli university. “It does not seem to be a priority of the regime to address the drought issue,” he said. “As long as it’s not a priority, nothing will happen until something breaks.” Many environmental activists believe Iran is quickly approaching its breaking point as diminishing rainfall and warmer temperatures have caused lakes to disappear, kicked up blinding dust storms and emptied out once fertile regions as farmers seek economic refuge in cities. Drought is a concern across the Middle East, but Iran’s 80 million people are especially at risk. This month, the director of Iran’s Drought and Crisis Management Center, Shahrokh Fateh, said that 96% of the country’s land area was experiencing prolonged drought conditions, the semiofficial ISNA news agency reported. In some of the hardest hit areas, including border provinces where ethnic and religious minorities complain of official neglect, concerns over natural resources were a key driver of the demonstrations that began in late December. “People in my area do not want to politicize their environmental concerns, but water shortages and pollution of the air and rivers are seen as political crises,” said Yusef Farhadi Babadi, an environmental activist in Chaharmahal-Bakhtiari. “People want to reclaim their rights to clean air and water and efficient water use.” In the province, which covers an area slightly larger than the state of Connecticut, there were once 3,800 natural springs, but about 1,100 have dried up, Babadi said, citing official statistics. The Iran Meteorological Organization forecast recently that for the Iranian year ending March 20, rainfall in the province would be more than 80% below the long-term average. Many in the predominantly agricultural region complain about a controversial series of canals the government has built to bring hundreds of millions of cubic feet of water from the Karun River, which runs through Chaharmahal-Bakhtiari, to growing populations in central provinces. Some of the water has gone to state-run steel mills in Esfahan, which Babadi described as “bankrupt...

Posted by salvatore on 1:42 pm in News | Commenti disabilitati su

[posted by Benjamin Haas on The Guardian, January 16, 2018] The Iranian oil tanker Sanchi sank off the coast of Shanghai on Sunday, after a week of burning and sending plumes of smoke hundreds of metres into the air. Only three bodies of the 32 sailors were recovered. The ship was carrying 136,000 tons, or about 1 million barrels, of oil, that now threatens to pollute some of China’s most important fishing waters. What was Sanchi transporting? The oil tanker was carrying condensate oil, which differs considerably from the thick black oil slicks typically associated with a spill. Instead, the colourless oil is a liquid only under certain conditions and is partially soluble in water, making it much harder to separate and detect. How much oil leaked? Currently, it is impossible to gauge exactly how much condensate ended up in the water. Some of it burned off and some probably evaporated, but any oil still onboard when the ship sank will slowly leak out over time and be difficult to contain. What will the impact be on the local environment? The condensate that leaked into the water could potentially wreak havoc on local fish spawning grounds and the Sanchi sank in the migratory path of the humpback whale, according to Greenpeace. While there will not be black beaches covered in oil, condensate is toxic when inhaled and on the skin and is described as “toxic to aquatic life with long lasting effects”. Another concern is the fuel that was powering the Sanchi. The day after it sank, China’s State Oceanic Administration reported two oil slicks, one nearly 15km long and another about 18km long, although it is unclear if these are from the cargo or the fuel tanks. “Given that the fuel tanks in these sorts of vessels are located close to the engine room, it is likely that the fuel tanks have remained intact since the initial collision,” said Paul Johnston, a research fellow at the University of Exeter. “It is possible that we will see chronic low volume leakage over a period of time at the seabed. … Impact would remain relatively local.” What could China have done differently? There were two competing goals in dealing with the tanker: putting out the fire in an effort to rescue the crew, or allowing as much oil as possible to burn off to limit polluting the waters. In the end, there was a mixture of both. The National Iranian Tanker Company, the firm that operated the ship, had two ships nearby and a spokesman for the company wondered why Chinese fire fighting boats were using water to douse the flames when foam would be more effective. While the blaze was still burning the Iranian Merchant Mariners Syndicate, an industry group, voiced frustration at the lack of progress in putting out the fire, and said it was “clear that the Chinese are not cooperating enough”. Other criticised Chinese efforts to subdue the fire, and suggested a plan that would have assumed the entire crew had no hope of rescue. Yu Zhirong, a former deputy of the East China Sea unit of China Marine Surveillance, told business magazine Caixin the Sanchi should have been bombed or torpedoed, causing an explosion that would burn up the remaining oil and limit the amount the seeped into the ocean. Allowing the ship to sink...

Posted by salvatore on 10:12 am in News | Commenti disabilitati su

[posted on The Conversation, January 9, 2018] The Vietnamese Mekong Delta is one of Earth’s most agriculturally productive regions and is of global importance for its exports of rice, shrimp, and fruit. The 18m inhabitants of this low-lying river delta are also some of the world’s most vulnerable to climate change. Over the last ten years around 1.7m people have migrated out of its vast expanse of fields, rivers and canals while only 700,000 have arrived. On a global level migration to urban areas remains as high as ever: one person in every 200 moves from rural areas to the city every year. Against this backdrop it is difficult to attribute migration to individual causes, not least because it can be challenging to find people who have left a region in order to ask why they went and because every local context is unique. But the high net rate of migration away from Mekong Delta provinces is more than double the national average, and even higher in its most climate-vulnerable areas. This implies that there is something else – probably climate-related – going on here. In 2013 we visited An Th?nh ?ông commune in Sóc Tr?ng Province aiming to collect survey data on agricultural yields. We soon realised that virtually no farmers of An Th?nh ?ông had any yields to report. The commune had lost its entire sugarcane crop after unexpectedly high levels of salt water seeped into the soil and killed the plants. Those without a safety net were living in poverty. Over the following weeks hundreds of smallholders, many of whom had farmed the delta for generations, would tell us that things were changing and their livelihoods would soon be untenable. In 2015-2016 disaster struck with the worst drought in a century. This caused salt water to intrude over 80km inland and destroyed at least 160,000ha of crops. In Kiên Giang (pop. 1.7m), one of the worst affected provinces, the local net migration rate jumped and in the year that followed around one resident in every 100 left. One relatively low profile article by Vietnamese academics may be a vital piece of the puzzle. The study, by Oanh Le Thi Kim and Truong Le Minh of Van Lang University, suggests that climate change is the dominant factor in the decisions of 14.5% of migrants leaving the Mekong Delta. If this figure is correct, climate change is forcing 24,000 people to leave the region every year. And it’s worth pointing out the largest factor in individual decisions to leave the Delta was found to be the desire to escape poverty. As climate change has a growing and complex relationship with poverty, 14.5% may even be an underestimate. There are a host of climate-linked drivers behind migration in the Delta. Some homes have quite literally fallen into the sea as the coast has eroded in the Southwestern portion of the delta – in some places 100m of coastal belt has been lost in a year. Hundreds of thousands of households are affected by the intrusion of salt water as the sea rises and only some are able to switch their livelihoods to salt-water tolerant commodities. Others have been affected by the increased incidence of drought, a trend which can be attributed in part to climate change, but also to upstream dam construction. Governments and communities in developing countries around the world have already begun taking...

Posted by salvatore on 10:07 am in News | Commenti disabilitati su

[posted by Alister Doyle on Reuters, January 11, 2018] Global warming is on track to breach the toughest limit set in the Paris climate agreement by the middle of this century unless governments make unprecedented economic shifts from fossil fuels, a draft U.N. report said. The draft, of a report due for publication in October, said governments will also have to start sucking carbon dioxide from the air to achieve the ambition of limiting temperatures to 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 Fahrenheit) above pre-industrial times. “There is very high risk that … global warming will exceed 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels,” the U.N. panel of experts wrote, based on the current pace of warming and current national plans to limit their greenhouse gas emissions. There were no historic precedents for the scale of changes required in energy use, to shift from fossil fuels to renewable energies, and in reforms ranging from agriculture to industry to stay below the 1.5C limit, it said. The draft, by the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) of leading scientists and obtained by Reuters, says average surface temperatures are about 1C above pre-industrial times and that average temperatures are on track to reach 1.5C by the 2040s. Curbing warming to 1.5C would help limit heat extremes, droughts and floods, more migration of people and even risks of conflict compared to higher rates of warming, according to the draft summary for policymakers. But a 1.5C rise might not be enough to protect many coral reefs, already suffering from higher ocean temperatures, and ice stored in Greenland and West Antarctica whose melt is raising sea levels. At a 2015 summit in Paris, almost 200 nations set a goal of limiting a rise in the world’s average surface temperatures to “well below” 2C (3.6 F) above pre-industrial times while “pursuing efforts” for the far tougher 1.5 ceiling. They commissioned the IPCC report to map the risks of each goal. The 1.5C limit is favored especially by developing nations most at risk from disruptions to food and water supplies. The current draft was sent out for comments from governments and other experts this week. Jonathan Lynn, spokesman for the IPCC, said the text was a work in progress not intended for publication. “The text can change substantially” he said. U.S. President Donald Trump, who doubts climate change is man-made, plans to pull out of the Paris Agreement and instead focus on U.S. fossil fuels. By contrast, the draft said that renewable energies such as solar and wind power would have to become the dominant form of primary energy by 2050 to achieve the 1.5C goal. “Coal would be phased out rapidly in most 1.5C pathways,” it said. And limiting global warming to 1.5C by 2100 would “involve removal of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere,” it said. That could mean planting vast forests, which soak up carbon dioxide as they grow, or building power plants that burn wood or other plant matter and then capturing and burying the carbon dioxide they release. But that it might not be feasible because forests could divert land from food crops. The draft estimated that humanity could emit just 580 billion tonnes of greenhouse gases to give a better than 50 percent chance of limiting warming to 1.5C – roughly 12-16 years...

Posted by salvatore on 1:48 pm in News | Commenti disabilitati su

[posted by Jonathan Watss on The Guardian, January 10, 2018] Ecuador’s state oil company has begun drilling the first of 97 planned wells inside a new field of the Yasuní national park, one of the world’s biodiversity hotspots. The opening of the Tambococha-2 well has triggered fierce criticism from conservationists, who say President Lenín Moreno is backtracking on a promise to protect the Amazon and pay greater heed to the opinion of indigenous groups. This is the second phase of the controversial Ishpingo-Tambococha-Tiputini (ITT) project, which started in 2016. Environmentalists say it goes deeper into the national park. At Tambococha-2, Petroamazonas will take eight days to drill down 1,800 metres to tap a reserve estimated at 287m barrels of crude, the company said. In the coming months and years, it plans to build four platforms and drill almost 100 wells. The company insists it will do so unobtrusively by concentrating drilling in a small area, burying pipes and putting in place precautions against spills. But critics say it is impossible to guarantee zero impact on such a biologically sensitive area. They say the opening of roads and influx of workers is likely to accelerate deforestation, hunting and colonisation and could result in conflict with two isolated nomadic tribes. It is a conundrum for Moreno, who was praised by environmentalists last year after promising the United Nations he would do more to protect the Amazon. He has agreed greater consultation with local communities before granting new mining concessions and Ecuador will shortly hold a referendum on whether to expand protections for Yasuní. That may come too late, given Petroamazonas’s latest move, which is the most intrusive development yet in the ITT area of Yasuní. “Drilling in Yasuni directly contradicts Moreno’s UN pledge and the expanded protections proposed in the referendum,” said Carlos Mazabanda, Ecuador field coordinator with Amazon Watch. “It also contradicts Ecuador’s constitution, which recognises the rights of nature and seeks to protect sensitive ecosystems from ‘activities that could lead to species extinction, the destruction of ecosystems, or the permanent alteration of natural cycles’.” Yasuní was once a beacon of hope for global conservation. In 2007, former president Rafael Correa offered to leave the oil in the ground in return for $3.6bn (£3bn) compensation from the global community, but the plan was scrapped six years later with less than 10% of the target figure raised....

Posted by salvatore on 10:16 am in News | Commenti disabilitati su

[posted by Karen Savage on Climate Liability News, January 10, 2018] New York City is suing five major oil companies, becoming the latest in a growing number of municipalities attempting to hold the industry accountable for damages caused by climate change. New York Mayor Bill de Blasio will announce in a press conference Wednesday afternoon the suit against BP, Chevron, ConocoPhillips, ExxonMobil, and Royal Dutch Shell, the five largest investor-owned fossil fuel companies as measured by their contributions to global warming. He will also announce that the city will divest its pension funds of $5 billion in fossil fuel investments. “New York City is standing up for future generations by becoming the first major U.S. city to divest our pension funds from fossil fuels,” de Blasio said in a statement. “At the same time, we’re bringing the fight against climate change straight to the fossil fuel companies that knew about its effects and intentionally misled the public to protect their profits. As climate change continues to worsen, it’s up to the fossil fuel companies whose greed put us in this position to shoulder the cost of making New York safer and more resilient.” The city will seek billions in damages to cover infrastructure improvements needed to protect New Yorkers from the increasing effects of climate change. The city has already begun implementing a $20 billion climate resiliency plan to protect city infrastructure from rising seas and extreme weather. Now New York wants to shift the burden of protecting the city from climate change impacts back onto the companies it says have overwhelmingly caused the crisis. When Superstorm Sandy hit New York City in 2012, it killed 43 people, caused $19 billion in damages and flooded nearly 90,000 buildings. Two million residents were left without power and 6,500 patients had to be evacuated from hospitals and nursing homes.  It drove home the city’s vulnerability to climate impacts and de Blasio made climate action a big part of his initial campaign for mayor in 2012. “This is what climate leadership looks like,” Michael Brune, executive director of the Sierra Club, said in a statement after Wednesday’s announcement. “To confront the climate crisis, we must hold corporate polluters accountable in the streets, in the boardrooms, and in the courts.” In the complaint, New York—which has a coastline longer than the coastlines of Boston, Los Angeles, Miami and San Francisco combined—says it now faces further threats to its property, infrastructure and to the health and safety of its residents. The city is asking for $19 billion for projects already underway, as well as additional costs for unfunded projects and projects that would not be so urgently needed if not for climate change. The complaint notes that the fossil fuel defendants have already been “taking climate change impacts into account when planning for and building their own operations and infrastructure,” but continue to “double down on the production of massive amounts of oil and natural gas, and encourage consumers to use unlimited amounts of fossil fuel products, despite having known for decades that this conduct was substantially certain to cause grave harm, including by putting coastal cities like New York City on the front lines of climate disaster.” A recent study found that by 2030 New York’s 8.5 million people could experience Sandy-like flooding every five years and a report compiled in 2015 by the second New...

Eni trascinata a processo a Milano per disastro ambientale in Nigeria

Posted by salvatore on 8:18 am in Notizie | Commenti disabilitati su Eni trascinata a processo a Milano per disastro ambientale in Nigeria

[di Lorenzo Bagnoli su Osservatorio Diritti] Il 9 gennaio a Milano ha avuto inizio un processo storico. Da una parte ci sono i legali della ong Friends of the earth, che rappresentano il re Francis Ododo e gli oltre 5 mila abitanti della comunità Ikebiri, un popolo che vive di pesca e agricoltura sul delta del Niger, in Nigeria. Dall’altro c’è il colosso dell’Oil&Gas Eni, insieme alla sua controllata Nigerian Agip Oil Company (Naoc). La comunità nigeriana chiede a Eni 2 milioni di euro di risarcimento danni per un disastro ambientale avvenuto nel 2010 a Clough Creek, nello Stato meridionale del Beyalsa. A questo aggiungono la bonifica di 17,5 ettari di terreni contaminati da 150 barili di petrolio fuoriusciuti dalle tubature di un oleodotto. Da parte sua, Eni riconosce l’incidente, ma non la sua entità. I danni, secondo la difesa, sono di 10 mila euro, gli ettari interessati 9 e i barili sversati 50. Alla prima udienza, i legali della multinazionale si sono presentati con diverse riserve. Tra queste, una più delle altre preoccupava la difesa: la competenza territoriale. Eni voleva bloccare il processo in Italia e spostarlo – per motivi dei giurisdizione – in Nigeria. Il giudice Maura Barberis della decima sezione del Tribunale di Milano ha deciso però di non affrontare la questione e di convocare una prossima udienza il 18 aprile, in cui probabilmente si entrerà nel merito del processo. La difesa ha raccolto dieci affidavit, cioè 10 dichiarazioni giurate scritte, di persone presenti sul territorio al momento dell’incidente. Ci sono le dichiarazioni di anziani del villaggio, pescatori, imprenditori, contadini. Parlano di «effetti devastanti» sulla popolazione locale, perché «non è più possibile pescare»: secondo le voci raccolte dalla difesa, gli allevamenti di pesce sono andati distrutti. Sostengono anche che a causa dell’inquinamento e dei fumi respirati dopo l’incidente, in tanti si sono dovuti recare alle cliniche della zona per acquistare medicinali. Chi azzarda una stima dell’entità della perdita di gasolio afferma che è superiore ai 100 barili. L’avvocato Saltalamacchia, parlando a Osservatorio Diritti sostiene che è possibile che l’area contaminata sia ormai «molto grande». Le testimonianze concordano sul fatto che sia divampato un incendio a seguito della perdita di petrolio, che ha avuto effetti sull’area paludosa, gli alberi e i pesci della zona. Il timore è che la contaminazione possa aver raggiunto la falda acquifera e quindi propagarsi ulteriormente. Finora l’azienda ha pagato 6 mila euro di danni come «contributo di primo soccorso»,che però non riguarda la compensazione per i danni subiti. Jonathan Osain Bein è un consigliere anziano del re degli Ikebiri. Il suo è uno degli affidavit più lunghi. Ha lavorato come manodopera locale nel settore petrolifero nel 1987: ha delle competenze in materia. Sostiene che in molti, dopo l’incidente, sono andati a farsi curare per delle complicanze legate all’inquinamento. Ricorda diversi incidenti lungo l’oleodotto tra il 1992 e il 2000. È uno dei tanti che ritiene che Naoc ed Eni non siano intervenute per tempo per contenere i danni. L’esatto contrario di quanto scrive l’azienda del Cane a sei zampe in una replica a un articolo uscito su l’Espresso: «Naoc ha avviato un dialogo costruttivo con gli esponenti della comunità Ikebiri, ed è intervenuta in modo tempestivo ed efficace per bonificare i siti interessati, che sono stati oggetto di ispezione da parte delle autorità competenti nigeriane con esito positivo». I legali di Eni hanno mostrato alla controparte il certificato di bonifica il 10 dicembre 2017. Lo ha rilasciato la National Oil Spill Detection and Response Agency (Nosdra), agenzia governativa che ha firmato anche il...

Contestazioni territoriali ambientali: presentato il XII Rapporto dell’Osservatorio Nimby forum

Posted by salvatore on 8:34 am in Italia, News, Notizie | Commenti disabilitati su Contestazioni territoriali ambientali: presentato il XII Rapporto dell’Osservatorio Nimby forum

[su ARPAT] In Italia, nel 2016, sono state 359 le infrastrutture e gli impianti oggetto di contestazioni ambientali, in aumento del 5% rispetto all’anno precedente. Relativamente alle nuove contestazioni, nel 2016 si aggiungono ben 119 opere, +7.2% rispetto al 2015. I settori più criticati sono il comparto energetico (56,7%), che comprende gli impianti per la produzione di energia elettrica da fonti fossili e rinnovabili, ed il trattamento rifiuti (37,4%), che comprende impianti per la raccolta e lo smaltimento di rifiuti urbani e speciali, dalle discariche ai termovalorizzatori agli impianti di compostaggio. La tipologia di attività più contestata si conferma quella della ricerca e dell’estrazione di idrocarburi (22,5% del totale); nel settore energetico gli impianti da rinnovabili rappresentano il 75,4%, mentre quelli da fonti fossili sono il 24,6%. Nel 2016 ricompaiono anche le centrali geotermiche, che sono circa il 3% delle opere contestate. Le maggiori contestazioni relative a impianti da fonti rinnovabili sono sicuramente motivate dal fatto che questi impianti sono quelli che vengono più spesso costruiti; è infatti raro trovare impianti di nuova costruzione che sfruttano fonti convenzionali o fossili. Gli incentivi che supportano una tipologia di fonti rinnovabili piuttosto che un’altra giocano un ruolo fondamentale nei cambiamenti da un anno all’altro: si nota ad esempio che rispetto al 2015 mancano le contestazioni verso gli impianti fotovoltaici, dal momento che il Governo ha rimosso gli incentivi per questo tipo di fonte energetica. I comitati e le associazioni sono gli attori principali delle contestazioni, seguiti da enti pubblici ed esponenti della politica, che sommati costituiscono il 50% degli oppositori. Il bisogno, condiviso da cittadini ed enti locali, di essere maggiormente partecipi delle decisioni, si riscontra anche nei motivi delle contestazioni: al secondo posto ci sono infatti carenze procedurali e mancanza di coinvolgimento nei confronti di enti locali e cittadini. Tra i motivi delle contestazioni, i principali sono impatto sull’ambiente, che preoccupa il 30% dei soggetti coinvolti, assenza di coinvolgimento e partecipazione, effetti su salute, a causa dell’emissione nell’aria, nell’acqua o nella terra di sostanze liquide o gassose che causerebbero danni alla salute dei cittadini delle zone limitrofe agli impianti. Questi in estrema sintesi i risultati della dodicesima edizione del Nimby Forum, l’Osservatorio Media Permanente che attraverso il monitoraggio quotidiano di una rassegna stampa tematica censisce e analizza gli impianti contestati in Italia. Per quanto riguarda la Toscana, tra le 30 contestazioni censite dall’Osservatorio, ci sono ben 7 nuovi ingressi rispetto al precedente anno, tutti relativi alla risorsa geotermica: Impianto geotermico Castelnuovo (PI) Impianto geotermico Cortolla Montecatini Val di Cecina (PI) Impianto geotermico La Fornace (PI) Impianto geotermico Soiana (PI) Impianto geotermico Casa del Corto Piancastagnaio (SI) Impianto geotermico Lucignano – Radicondoli (SI) Permesso di ricerca risorse geotermiche Casanova (SI) Gli altri impianti toscani contestati sono: Biomasse Castiglion Fiorentino (AR) Gasdotto Brindisi-Minerbio (AR) Inceneritore San Zeno (AR) Biomasse Petrona – Scarperia (FI) Discarica di Le Borra – Figline Valdarno (FI) Discarica rifiuti speciali Paterno – Vaglia (FI) Inceneritore Case Passerini – Sesto F.no (FI) Biomasse Grosseto – Cernaia (GR) Inceneritore Scarlino (GR) Biomasse Collesalvetti (LI) Rigassificatore Livorno (LI) Rigassificatore Rosignano (LI) Inceneritore di Livorno (LI) Centrale idroelettrica del Lima – Bagni di Lucca (LU) Elettrodotto La Spezia Acciaiolo (LU) Impianto compostaggio Capannori (LU) Biomasse Pontremoli (MS) Discarica Cava Fornace Montignoso (MS) Centrale idroelettrica Pracchiola (MS) Discarica di Buriano – Montecatini Val di Cecina (PI) Gassificatore di Pontedera – Gello (PI) Impianto compostaggio Gello di Pontedera...

Posted by salvatore on 9:41 am in News | Commenti disabilitati su

[posted by Tom DiChristopher on CNBC, January 4, 2018] The Trump Interior Department announced Thursday plans to offer blocks in the Arctic, Atlantic and Pacific oceans for oil and gas exploration in an ambitious new five-year offshore lease plan. Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke said the draft proposal for offshore leasing between 2019 and 2024 would offer about 90 percent of the U.S. outer continental shelf, the largest lease sale ever. The only area that will not be included is the North Aleutian Basin in Alaska. The plan would open the door for drilling in areas far beyond the U.S. epicenter of offshore drilling in the central and western Gulf of Mexico, giving oil and gas companies the opportunity to explore areas left out of leases for decades. But the move also sets up a battle with environmental groups and coastal governors opposed to drilling off the shores of states from California to North Carolina. Additionally, it comes at a time when oil prices are on the rise, but stuck in a range that makes multibillion-dollar projects in new offshore areas unattractive for many drillers. It would also overturn indefinite bans on drilling in much of the Arctic Ocean and parts of the Atlantic announced during the final days of the Obama administration, potentially sparking a court battle over executive authority. The administration’s expansive lease schedule was widely anticipated. In April, Trump signed the America First Offshore Energy Executive Order instructing Zinke to revise the current five-year schedule for leasing blocks of the U.S. outer continental shelf, the waters off the U.S. shore that the federal government governs. At the time, he explicitly said it reversed the Obama administration’s ban on Arctic leases. Revisions are not uncommon when a new president takes office; Obama initiated a new five-year planning process in his first term. The revision process, which includes conducting environmental impact studies and taking public comments, has taken about two years in the past, said Connie Gillette, chief of public affairs for the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, the unit of the Interior Department that oversees the lease schedule. Gillette confirmed to CNBC that the bureau will attempt to finalize the plan by 2019, but would not circumvent the process. Zinke said Thursday that Interior would try to complete the process in “months.” In its latest plan for the 2017-2022 period, the Obama administration offered a conservative selection of leases in the western and central Gulf of Mexico and Alaska’s Cook Inlet, leaving contested areas like the Atlantic, Pacific and eastern Gulf of Mexico off the table. Drilling in the Atlantic and Pacific outer continental shelf faces stiff opposition from many governors, including Trump allies like Florida Gov. Rick Scott. “I have already asked to immediately meet with Secretary Zinke to discuss the concerns I have with this plan and the crucial need to remove Florida from consideration,” Scott said in a statement. Sen. Bill Nelson, D-Fla., also plans to challenge the Trump administration’s plans to relax offshore drilling safety rules put in place after the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in 2010. Tough environment for offshore investment It also remains unclear whether the oil and gas industry has the appetite for leases in largely uncharted territory. Recent federal lease sales have generated a tepid response, said Imran Khan, who leads Wood Mackenzie’s commercial valuation team for oil and...

No all’Italia hub del gas per le multinazionali

Posted by salvatore on 8:07 am in Notizie | Commenti disabilitati su No all’Italia hub del gas per le multinazionali

[di Alessio Di Florio su Terre di frontiera] La decisione del governo Gentiloni di autorizzare la centrale di compressione gas di Sulmona, ha riportato l’attenzione sul progetto del gasdotto Snam denominato Rete Adriatica. Per fare il punto della situazione a seguito degli ultimi sviluppi che hanno interessato l’intera vicenda, abbiamo intervistato Riccardo Verrocchi, attivista storico dei movimenti ambientalisti di Sulmona. Lunedì 8 gennaio, centinaia di cittadini hanno partecipato ad un’assemblea pubblica organizzata, a Paganica dell’Aquila, dall’Amministrazione separata beni di uso civico di Paganica, dal Comitato 3e32 dell’Aquila, dai Comitati cittadini per l’ambiente di Sulmona e da AltreMenti. La mobilitazione è nata a seguito della decisione del Consiglio dei ministri, avvenuta il 22 dicembre 2017, di autorizzato alla Snam la realizzazione della centrale di compressione gas di Sulmona. L’opera è prevista in un’area di 12 ettari nelle frazioni di Case Pente, Case San Mariano e Colle Savente. Il progetto prevede tre turbocompressori meccanici alti 10 metri e con una potenza di 11 megawatt l’uno, tre caldaie e un camino di 14 metri. La centrale sarà uno snodo fondamentale per la “Rete Adriatica” (della stessa Snam): un gasdotto di 687 chilometri sull’asse Brindisi-Minerbio. Dalla Puglia all’Emilia Romagna. Nel corso dell’assemblea il sottosegretario alla presidenza della Regione Abruzzo, Mario Mazzocca, ha confermato quanto già dichiarato nei giorni precedenti dal governatore Luciano D’Alfonso, ovvero che la Giunta regionale farà ricorso al Tar del Lazio contro l’autorizzazione del governo. Ma il comportamento della Giunta regionale non è stata esente da critiche. I promotori dell’iniziativa hanno invocato “prese di posizione forti e azioni concrete anche nei confronti delle forze politiche protagoniste nei governi nazionali che negli ultimi venti anni hanno fatto la loro parte nell’iter autorizzativo del progetto.” Nel mirino anche la scelta della Giunta regionale – invitata al Consiglio dei ministri del 22 dicembre 2017 – di non avvertire i comitati locali della convocazione, così come la mancata convocazione di un tavolo con le altre Regioni per cercare di imporre al governo lo stop al progetto. La decisione del governo Gentiloni, già nel periodo natalizio, ha scatenato una fortissima protesta istituzionale. La sindaca di Sulmona, Annamaria Casini, alla notizia ha deciso di dimettersi, definendo l’autorizzazione alla centrale un vilipendio contro il territorio violentato dal cinismo della politica e dei partiti. Il 29 dicembre la Casini si è anche recata a Palazzo Chigi con l’intenzione di restituire la fascia tricolore al premier Gentiloni, accompagnata da altri ventidue primi cittadini del comprensorio: Anversa, Acciano, Ateleta, Bugnara, Campo di Giove, Cansano, Castel di Sangro, Castelvecchio, Castel di ieri, Cocullo, Introdacqua, Gagliano, Goriano, Molina, Pettorano, Prezza, Roccacasale, Roccapia, Roccaraso, Scanno, Secinaro e Villalago. Al termine dell’incontro la sindaca di Sulmona ha ottenuto un congelamento del decreto autorizzativo in attesa di un incontro direttamente con Paolo Gentiloni, assente per l’occasione e sostituito dal suo consigliere politico Gabriele De Giorgi. Riccardo, la decisione del governo di autorizzare la centrale di compressione gas di Sulmona ha rappresentato per voi il classico fulmine a ciel sereno o vi aspettavate un epilogo di questo tipo? Quali posizioni avete espresso e quali decisioni avete preso nel corso dell’assemblea di Paganica? Sì, l’autorizzazione alla costruzione della centrale di compressione della Snam, in località Case Pente a Sulmona, è stato un vero e proprio fulmine a ciel sereno. È stata una doccia fredda anche perché gli ultimi due incontri interistituzionali convocati a Palazzo Chigi, a...